[video=youtube][/video]
Olympic barrel roll!!!!!!!
THIS IS FALCOOOOOOOOOOOOo
i'm actually headbanging to this.
all of you
Yuka wrote: Got 100% in my mechanic mock exam gg
Got 100% in my mechanic mock exam gg
Nice for you 🙂 Good job!
[video=youtube][/video] this made me happy
Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: RX14 wrote: Yuka wrote: I'm not even good at mechanics, at one point I ended up proving that if any object is on a slope it should float upwards even if it has like an infinitely huge mass Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now? Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute
Yuka wrote: RX14 wrote: Yuka wrote: I'm not even good at mechanics, at one point I ended up proving that if any object is on a slope it should float upwards even if it has like an infinitely huge mass Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now? Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics
RX14 wrote: Yuka wrote: I'm not even good at mechanics, at one point I ended up proving that if any object is on a slope it should float upwards even if it has like an infinitely huge mass Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now?
Yuka wrote: I'm not even good at mechanics, at one point I ended up proving that if any object is on a slope it should float upwards even if it has like an infinitely huge mass
I'm not even good at mechanics, at one point I ended up proving that if any object is on a slope it should float upwards even if it has like an infinitely huge mass
Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now?
Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics
if you were a triangle, you'd be acute
If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i)
Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: RX14 wrote: Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now? Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i)
Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: RX14 wrote: Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now? Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute
Yuka wrote: RX14 wrote: Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now? Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics
RX14 wrote: Did you ever unprove it or should I be scared of slopes now?
Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad!
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad!
Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i)
Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics if you were a triangle, you'd be acute
Yuka wrote: Well I just proved it by making a triangle wrongly, I messed up, I no like triangles in mechanics
Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p
Seeing all my course grades above 90%.
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad!
Yuka wrote: Melancholy wrote: if you were a triangle, you'd be acute If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i)
Melancholy wrote: if you were a triangle, you'd be acute
Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well.
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well.
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i) Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad!
Yuka wrote: If you was an Indentity you'd be a qt (ln-1)/(i)
Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea.
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea.
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well.
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad! Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p
malmon wrote: Woah woah woah, hold on just one goddamn second. Our maths teacher never said anything about logs of negative numbers! You must be mad!
Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea.
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well.
Yuka wrote: Logs of negative numbers are not 'real' numbers, they're 'complex' numbers, i is also a complex number so when I divide by it the complex number become a real number Pi :p
Rip I got a D in Pure Maths 1, but a B or A in everything else
Porn Video that I found recently.
oh no. I'm lewd
FukuchiChiisaia wrote: Porn Video that I found recently. oh no. I'm lewd
///<
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂 Rip I got a D in Pure Maths 1, but a B or A in everything else
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well. Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea.
malmon wrote: Yeah, for some reason I never remember learning about negative Logs, which I find rather odd. Oh well.
you'll get a D from me too 😉
I got to play video games with my good friends, which I always enjoy. Also bonus points for my roomate who pulled me out of being upset by talking to me.
Melancholy wrote: Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂 Rip I got a D in Pure Maths 1, but a B or A in everything else you'll get a D from me too 😉
Yuka wrote: malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂 Rip I got a D in Pure Maths 1, but a B or A in everything else
malmon wrote: Yuka wrote: Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea. Pure maths is the only aspect I really enjoy 🙂
Yuka wrote: Not that unusual, cause from this graph Loading Image you can see the log of a negative number doesn't exsist (or better yet, isn't a real number) and actually learning about logging to get complex numbers brings in stuff from calculus and pure maths which isn't really a good idea.
This video.
seel wrote: [video=youtube][/video] This video.
I've seen heaven
My caseless flash drive managed to come out completely intact from a run through the washing and drying machines.
