I made $1,972.22 in February from a YouTube video, 1.15m views, 8.9k likes, 145 comments.
Loading Image
Lokorfi wrote: Must've been a pretty swood video.
Must've been a pretty swood video.
It was in the Music category, I had downloaded the song like 2 minutes after it was uploaded to SoundCloud, put in it Premiere and attached an image to the video, uploaded then monetized.
Flippy wrote: Lokorfi wrote: Must've been a pretty swood video. It was in the Music category, I had downloaded the song like 2 minutes after it was uploaded to SoundCloud, put in it Premiere and attached an image to the video, uploaded then monetized.
Yet other people have had their channels taken down despite actually adhering to fair use...
That's sick asf bro. I made over $100k a few days ago from just saving and selling. 😛
I know this trick which the millionaires don't want you to know.
I'm jealous :3
that's $2k that the content creator could've had :c
Hey @[deleted] I suggest you take the high-road here and give it to the guy who uploaded the song. I'm sure he'll really appreciate it and omg youtube is broken.
Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator.
monothedog wrote: Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator.
Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers.
Flippy wrote: monothedog wrote: Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator. Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers.
You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world.
Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: monothedog wrote: Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator. Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world.
The artist's name is Travis Scott
I love how everyone is talking about fair use and the moral implications of this stuff, then Cloudy wanders in as always to talk about how much money they have.
Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: monothedog wrote: Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator. Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott
Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: monothedog wrote: Using ContentID this would be easily prevented by the creator. Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world.
So we are talking about this video? [video=youtube][/video]
PetersPark wrote: Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott So we are talking about this video? [video=youtube][/video]
Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott
Inkjet Printer wrote: Flippy wrote: Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers. You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world.
Flippy wrote: Yeah, it's a pretty popular artist I would say. I have a copyright claim on one of my videos where the artist's main channel only has a few hundred subscribers.
I'm positive it's this one, look at the stats of the video compared to the stats he posted:　 [spoiler] Loading Image[/spoiler]
Inkjet Printer wrote: PetersPark wrote: Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott So we are talking about this video? [video=youtube][/video] I'm positive it's this one, look at the stats of the video compared to the stats he posted:　 [spoiler] Loading Image[/spoiler]
PetersPark wrote: Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott So we are talking about this video? [video=youtube][/video]
Flippy wrote: Inkjet Printer wrote: You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world. The artist's name is Travis Scott
Inkjet Printer wrote: You know most artists make jack shit even if they're "pretty popular" right? Only the biggest artists out there earn enough to make a good buck out of this, even a band like Lamb of God (who had a #2 charting album this year) still struggle to make rounds even though they're playing large venues all over the world.
But how is it being monetised? I'm not getting any ads.
Internet Magic!
sweet earnings! i only wish i could make that much.
no job sucks :C
Katherine wrote: I love how everyone is talking about fair use and the moral implications of this stuff, then Cloudy wanders in as always to talk about how much money they have.
What's the point of you going on me. ;( I shared my earnings just like OP did. If you'd like proof like him I am glad to show it. 🙂 Just don't be jelly.
Cloudy wrote: Katherine wrote: I love how everyone is talking about fair use and the moral implications of this stuff, then Cloudy wanders in as always to talk about how much money they have. What's the point of you going on me. ;( I shared my earnings just like OP did. If you'd like proof like him I am glad to show it. 🙂 Just don't be jelly.
What currency?
Loading Image