Source 2 will be free; won't ask for royalties

by Uzinero

Uzinero
/pol/ack
/pol/
Posts: 325
Threads: 30
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 2
03-05-2015, 10:15 AM
#4934 (1)
It's battle of the engines at this year's GDC. It's a war on two fronts: prettiness and price. In other words, what will the engine let developers do, and how much will they have to give up to do it. Unreal Engine 4, for instance, is now free to use, but requires a 5% royalty on gross revenue over a small allowance.

So how about Valve's new Source 2? Talking to RPS, Valve's Erik Johnson explained that Source 2 would be free for developers, and that there would be no royalty charge for using the engine. There is, however, still one catch. Games made in Source 2 must be sold through Steam.

That means that Valve will take their standard 30% cut for Steam distribution. Crucially, Steam doesn't have to be the exclusive distributor. Source 2 developers will be free to sell their game wherever they like, even directly, as long as they also sell through Steam.

That seems like a pretty good deal, but it's one that raises a major question: if Source 2 games must be sold on Steam, does that mean that Source 2 games instantly bypass Greenlight? If so, that could be an attractive bonus for developers looking for a guaranteed place on PC gaming's biggest distribution channel.


Source:
Quote:http://www.pcgamer.com/source-2-will-be-...royalties/

My opinion:
Doesn't hold up, steam gets 20-30% of every sale on steam, UE4 takes 5% royalties, so if they're trying to compete with them, they've already failed for anyone trying to maximize their games earnings.

Melancholy
すけべ
Admin
Posts: 3,863
Threads: 213
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 60
03-05-2015, 03:45 PM
#4940 (2)
Being on Steam increases sales anyway, the 30% cut is meaningless when you're selling a lot more copies.