AMD R9 290X As Fast As Titan X in DX12 Enabled 3DMark, 33% Faster Than GTX 980

by BlueScreen

BlueScreen
smacking fat bitches for riches
Banned
Posts: 196
Threads: 24
Joined: Dec 2014
03-26-2015, 06:29 PM (This post was last modified: 03-26-2015, 06:30 PM by BlueScreen.)
#5314 (1)
[Image: 687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f69...6e2e706e67]

Found this article from wccftech where someone ran a 3DMark DX12 enabled benchmark, and I found it a very
interesting read. I do find it quite sad that a $250 GPU from AMD beats the "Fastest (single)GPU in the world"
the Titan X which is $1000. Then again we'd have to see some "in the wild" benchmarks when Windows 10 has
actually officially come out, and everyone has had time to fully optimize their drivers.

http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-290x-fast-tit...r-gtx-980/
Uzinero
/pol/ack
/pol/
Posts: 325
Threads: 30
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 2
03-27-2015, 06:21 PM
#5326 (2)
I have 2 980's...Time to KMS.

Lancelot
Ceaselessly Dead
Kohai
Posts: 327
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 6
07-12-2015, 05:04 PM
#11254 (3)
(03-26-2015, 06:29 PM)BlueScreen Wrote: [Image: 687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f69...6e2e706e67]

Found this article from wccftech where someone ran a 3DMark DX12 enabled benchmark, and I found it a very
interesting read. I do find it quite sad that a $250 GPU from AMD beats the "Fastest (single)GPU in the world"
the Titan X which is $1000. Then again we'd have to see some "in the wild" benchmarks when Windows 10 has
actually officially come out, and everyone has had time to fully optimize their drivers.

http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-290x-fast-tit...r-gtx-980/

Lol this is pure bullshit, don't believe it

[Image: 687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f43...722e706e67]
Kieru
full-time autistic hypocrite
lainchan
Posts: 219
Threads: 9
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 4
07-12-2015, 05:30 PM (This post was last modified: 08-17-2015, 07:22 PM by Kieru.)
#11255 (4)
(07-12-2015, 05:04 PM)Mikoto Wrote: Lol this is pure bullshit, don't believe it

Didn't bother to read the article, but it does seem a bit fishy. The Fury X alone can only compare to the 980.

[Image: 687474703a2f2f692e706f6d662e706c2f70776c6f66742e706e67]
Lancelot
Ceaselessly Dead
Kohai
Posts: 327
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 6
07-12-2015, 06:13 PM
#11257 (5)
(07-12-2015, 05:30 PM)Kieru Wrote: AMD really showed us what's to come with the Fury X. Shit's about to go off.
[Image: 687474703a2f2f706f6d662e706c2f31357870]

(07-12-2015, 05:04 PM)Mikoto Wrote:
(03-26-2015, 06:29 PM)BlueScreen Wrote: [Image: 687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f69...6e2e706e67]

Found this article from wccftech where someone ran a 3DMark DX12 enabled benchmark, and I found it a very
interesting read. I do find it quite sad that a $250 GPU from AMD beats the "Fastest (single)GPU in the world"
the Titan X which is $1000. Then again we'd have to see some "in the wild" benchmarks when Windows 10 has
actually officially come out, and everyone has had time to fully optimize their drivers.

http://wccftech.com/amd-r9-290x-fast-tit...r-gtx-980/

Lol this is pure bullshit, don't believe it

Didn't bother to read the article, but it does seem a bit fishy. The Fury X alone can only compare to the 980.
it's pure shit man, just go to amazon, check out titan x and amd r9 290x, you'll see the big differences in the descriptions, Titan x is way better than amd r9 209x

[Image: 687474703a2f2f692e696d6775722e636f6d2f43...722e706e67]